Vetus M4.35 vs Bukh DV36 RME
The Vetus M4.35 is a 33 hp 4-cylinder marine diesel aimed at medium sailboats and powerboats, and a common alternative to the Bukh DV36 RME. The Vetus is a 4-cylinder and the Bukh a 3-cylinder unit. The Bukh rates slightly higher on paper (36 hp vs 33 hp), though both target similar vessels, so drive options — the Vetus offers a saildrive — along with weight and support are what set them apart.

M4.35 · 33 hp
View full specs
DV36 RME · 36 hp
At a glance: Vetus M4.35 vs Bukh DV36 RME
Side-by-side specifications. The highlight tags are generated from the published figures — where the Bukh genuinely wins a measure, we show it.
Specifications sourced from manufacturer data sheets and correct at time of publishing — confirm current specifications before purchase. *Vetus warranty: 3 years standard plus a 2-year driveline extension with a Vetus around-the-engine package.
Why choose the Vetus M4.35
- High-output marine alternator fitted as standard (110 A).
- Self-bleeding fuel system — no manual bleeding after filter changes.
- Lighter installed weight — 199 kg vs 265 kg.
- Available with shaft drive or saildrive.
- Lower rated engine speed (3000 rpm vs 3600 rpm) for quieter, less-stressed cruising.
- Backed by Luxfords Marine, the authorised Victorian Vetus distributor — local advice, stock and genuine parts support.
Things to weigh up with the Bukh DV36 RME
Where the Bukh is strong
- Genuine own-design, heavy-duty continuous-rated marine engine
- SOLAS/DNV approvals, multiple redundant starting systems
- Built for commercial, lifeboat and rescue duty
- Premium commercial/safety-grade pricing — substantially more engine (and cost) than a recreational vessel typically needs.
- Heavy for the power output (e.g. ~210 kg for a 24-32 hp DV) versus much lighter recreational diesels.
- Shaft-drive only; no saildrive option for sailboat installs.
The verdict
The Bukh DV36 RME is a sound choice in its own right — known for genuine own-design, heavy-duty continuous-rated marine engine. If your vessel genuinely needs heavy-duty, continuously-rated, SOLAS-grade power, Bukh is purpose-built for it. For most recreational and cruising owners, though, the Vetus M4.35 offers the better balance of performance, lighter weight and saildrive flexibility for leisure use — and it's backed locally by Luxfords here in Victoria.
Vetus M4.35 vs Bukh DV36 RME — FAQs
Is the Vetus M4.35 lighter than the Bukh DV36 RME?
Yes. The Vetus M4.35 has a lower dry weight (199 kg) than the Bukh DV36 RME (265 kg) — around 66 kg lighter on a like-for-like basis.
Can I get the Vetus M4.35 with a saildrive?
Yes — the Vetus M4.35 is available with either a shaft drive or a saildrive, whereas the Bukh DV36 RME is offered as shaft-drive only. That makes the Vetus the more flexible choice for sailboat installations.
Which has the longer warranty, the Vetus M4.35 or the Bukh DV36 RME?
Vetus offers up to a 5-year warranty (3 years standard plus a 2-year driveline extension with a Vetus around-the-engine package). Bukh's Australian warranty terms vary — confirm the current Bukh cover with the supplier so you're comparing like-for-like.
Where can I buy the Vetus M4.35 in Victoria?
Luxfords Marine Industrial Solutions in Mornington is the authorised Victorian Vetus distributor and can supply, advise on and support the Vetus M4.35, including parts and around-the-engine packages. Call (03) 5973 6444 for a quote.
Get a Vetus M4.35 quote
Tell us about your vessel and we'll confirm whether the Vetus M4.35 is the right fit, with pricing, drive options and availability. As the authorised Victorian Vetus distributor, Luxfords offers local advice, stock and genuine parts support.
(03) 5973 6444Get a Quote — Vetus M4.35
More Vetus M4.35 comparisons


Vetus M4.35 vs Beta Marine Beta 35
33 hp · 4-cyl · 199 kg vs 170 kg


Vetus M4.35 vs Nanni N4.38
33 hp · 4-cyl · 199 kg vs 152 kg


Vetus M4.35 vs Volvo Penta D2-40
33 hp · 4-cyl · 199 kg vs 178 kg


Vetus M4.35 vs Yanmar 3JH40
33 hp · 4-cyl · 199 kg vs 192 kg


Vetus M4.35 vs Beta Marine Beta 38
33 hp · 4-cyl · 199 kg vs 170 kg